I'm certainly more of a nationalist when it comes to immigration to Europe, especially both Muslim and African immigration. But for the US, I'm willing to accept a lot of low average IQ Latin American immigration on humanitarian grounds if we will also continue aggressively recruiting global cognitive elites.
I don’t see the US being in such bad shape, actually. It still attracts global cognitive elites and could attract many, many more of them if we will open our doors much wider to them.
The impression that I got is that East Asia is relatively poor relative to their average IQ because their productivity was low, in part due to them wasting manpower on unnecessary things.
I'm certainly more of a nationalist when it comes to immigration to Europe, especially both Muslim and African immigration. But for the US, I'm willing to accept a lot of low average IQ Latin American immigration on humanitarian grounds if we will also continue aggressively recruiting global cognitive elites.
I don’t see the US being in such bad shape, actually. It still attracts global cognitive elites and could attract many, many more of them if we will open our doors much wider to them.
Are you for or against the EU, BTW?
Well, long-term, either AI will make all of this irrelevant or we’re going to use large-scale voluntary eugenics to uplift all of us. Or both.
I care most of all that the US will remain an attractive destination country for global cognitive elites, once who can improve our own country.
The impression that I got is that East Asia is relatively poor relative to their average IQ because their productivity was low, in part due to them wasting manpower on unnecessary things.
Don’t Hispanics in the US live as well as, say, Brits do?
The frog is in a slow cooker.